A rare example of an equatorially bound terminal uranium(V) oxo complex in a chelating sulfur-based ligand environment, namely [(mes(
Me,AdArS)
3)U
V(O
eq)(THF)] (2), is presented. Octahedrally coordinated 2 is obtained by reaction of the mesitylene-anchored tris-thiophenolate-coordinated uranium(III) complex [U
III((SAr
Ad,Me)
3mes)] (1) with the oxygen-atom transfer reagent N
2O. The observed, equatorially bound oxo ligand in 2 is in stark contrast to its known tris-aryloxide analog, [(mes(
Me,AdArO)
3)U
V(O
ax)(THF)] (A), where the oxo ligand occupies the typically observed axial coordination site. Complexes 1 and 2 are characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses and spectroscopic and magnetochemical methods, including
1H NMR, UV/vis/NIR electronic absorption, as well as EPR spectroscopy
more » and SQUID magnetometry, thus confirming the CS symmetry and the pentavalent oxidation state of 2. Encompassing quantum chemical calculations (DFT and CASPT2) on 2 and its tris-phenolate analog A, support and rationalize the structural and electronic differences. The molecular orbital pictures show that a stabilizing σ-bonding interaction arising from the U–Oeq inverse trans influence (ITI) is present in 2 but missing in A. In 2, the sulfur 3p orbitals are closer in energy to the uranium 5f manifold than the arene π-system, leading to an ITI, while U–arene σ- or δ-bonding is not observed. Although the arene orbitals remain separated from the uranium 5f orbitals in A, the absence of an ITI allows the arene a2u orbital to engage in a σ-type interaction with the metal. Thus, incorporating a tris-thiophenolate to an arene anchor introduces a new design concept in molecular f-element chemistry. This approach stabilizes an equatorially bound U(V) oxo center, contrasting with its tris-phenolate counterpart, where oxo coordination is axial. The observed geometric divergence, driven by competing ITI and U–arene interactions, not only tunes electronic structure but also leads to differentiated reactivity: only the phenolate analogs activate H2O, while the thiolates do not.« less